Berks FHS Logo

Meeting Summary
13th October 2000 at Reading

HomeBerks FHS ContentsContents 

Meeting Summaries Index
 
Computer evening - Using Your Computer for Family History

'hosted' by Eddie Spackman on 13th October 2000 at Reading

Eddie Spackman 'hosted' the evening and '10 minute' contributions were provided by Chad Hanna (Hardware), Terry Wickenden (Using Office Software), Ann Davis (Why use your computer for Family History anyway), Gillian Stevens (Computer data available at the Research Centre) and Geoff Bryan (Images - principally an explanation of raster and vector formats amongst other things).

Ann Davis provided the following contribution on

Why use a Computer for Family History anyway?

As we are all well aware plenty of people were doing Family history or Genealogical research long before Computers for home use became available or affordable . So why use one now?

A computer is only a tool - and a very useful one - that the family historian can use in a number of ways. There are perhaps four main uses that a family historian can find for a computer.

First - for the presentation of the results of your hard work. I can remember drawing family trees by hand, a laborious task involving graph paper, tracing paper, a drafting pen and half a day. With a suitable computer program you only need to type the individual’s details once and the program can churn out Family Group Sheets, individual records, Family trees, even skeleton biographies of your ancestors. But all it is doing is rearranging, organising and presenting the information YOU have discovered and typed in. I repeat - you only type in the individual’s details once, and provided you got it right, there is no possibility of introducing copying errors. Conversely if you have got it wrong, and subsequently discover the true facts, you only need to correct it in one place and every Family Group Sheet, Wall chart or whatever that the program produces subsequently will be correct.

Second - to preserve your hard earned information. I would not rely solely on a computer, I would have a back up copy of the information, but its all there in one place.

Third - If you use a family history program it cannot do the research for you (despite the inflated claims of some program manufacturers), but it may point you in the direction of research to do. A computer program can apply simple checks and report if your information appears to be impossible, for example date of birth after date of baptism. It will probably have some system of showing what information is missing, for example the program I use is capable of generating a list of people who I have recorded as married, but with no date, or with no place of marriage.

Another thing that computers do very well is sorting. Recently I found some census information on one of the families in which I am interested. I knew that William Edmondson was living in the household of James Hargreaves in 1881 and described by him as his nephew, and that Ada Edmondson was also in the household by 1891. I suspected that “nephew” was an oversimplification. In the 1871 census I found William, age 2, Ada aged 8 months and parents Henry and Martha. A search on my family history file for persons “given name MARTHA, born 1850 “ revealed a Martha Emmott with no details of marriage. Martha herself is recorded in the 1851 census as the grand daughter of George Emmott, who was James Hargreaves father-in law. Now I will of course need to search for the marriage of Henry Edmondson, and if appropriate confirm the parentage of Martha, but it is very likely that Billy was not James Hargreaves’ nephew but the great nephew of James’ wife. The point is that in a clerical system I might not have picked up the possibility so quickly. I might have looked among the Hargreaves family for Martha, or even in the earlier generation of Emmotts.

Fourth - Communicating with other researchers. Particularly if researching an unusual name it is, as we know, often fruitful to contact other researchers or indeed people of the same surname. Using a computer you can write what is essentially the same letter more than once, to different people.. You may feel that a hand written letter is more acceptable but even then it is very easy to include a printed family tree, list of people etc.

All these points gain an extra dimension if you computer, as most being sold today are, is Internet ready.

If you are looking for software there are free demonstrations that you can down load to try out . There is even a full program, Personal Ancestral File available free from the LDS web site.

It is possible to preserve your family history by setting up a web page to store your information . The LDS site I believe has a method of facilitating this.

If you already use the IGI you will find its Internet version, FamilySearch a lot easier than going to the library. Unlike the microfiche version it is not divided into counties, so that for example, a recent search for the surname VOSPER showed that it is almost exclusive to Cornwall.

There is some family history information on the Web, but in my personal experience it is very much biased towards the USA, which is great if some of your family emigrated there, but not so helpful if they stayed in this country. The Commonwealth War Graves Commission has an excellent site which includes an index of all service deaths since the First World War. In perhaps half the entries there is sufficient biographical information to identify the deceased and attach him to a family. For example I have found three entries for the name Fuidge, Ernest William, J C, and Jack Henry. For Ernest William and J C there were details of regiment and date of death but no more, but for Jack Henry it gives “died 23 Apr 1918, age 21, son of Charles Strickland Fuidge and Juliana Eliza Fuidge of 7 Silverdale Road Southampton.” Previous to finding that information all I knew was that my grandfather had a brother named Jack , and my mother’s grandmother had lived in “Silver Street, Southampton”.

There is some “How to do it” information on Genealogy on the net, but I feel a lot of it is angled towards people who already have computers and are thinking of taking up family history, rather than the other way round.

Finally - It has been said that the family historians best Internet tool is email - basically its just an easier and faster way of communicating with other researchers. Not only can you contact other researchers but other Family History Societies. I belong to an email discussion group for people with an interest in the West Riding of Yorkshire. Basically members send in email requests, members interests, offers of help, requests for help, to a central point and they are then sent out to all the subscribers. There are even discussion groups for specific surnames.

So, if you are thinking about using a computer for Family History consider - it will not "find hundreds of ancestors at the click of a mouse" but it could almost certainly help you in you research, in storage and presentation of your material, and in communicating with other researchers.


Web-page produced by DandyLion Services
Please contact the webmaster with any queries
© Berkshire Family History Society 2001

updated 6th November 2000